In Arizona, certain home owners are free to stop making payments their home and walk away from it with no financial recourse against them. These people are protected by what is commonly known as Arizona’s Anti-Deficiency Statutes.
Protection for residential borrowers is set forth primarily in A.R.S. §§ 33-729(A) which provides in part:
“if a mortgage is given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price, or to secure a loan to pay all or part of the purchase price, of a parcel of real property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling, the lien of judgment in an action to foreclose such mortgage shall not extend to any other property of the judgment debtor, nor may general execution be issued against the judgment debtor to enforce such judgment.”
To obtain anti-deficiency protection the property securing the loan must be (1) two and one-half acres or less, (2) limited to a single one-family or a single two-family dwelling. The Arizona Supreme Court has interpreted this language to require that the dwelling be built and at least occasionally occupied. Mid Kan. Fed. Sav & Loan Ass’n, 167 Ariz. At 129, 804 P.2d at 1317. The property will qualify under the statute for anti-deficiency protection whether occasionally occupied by the owners or third party renters. Northern Arizona Properties v. Pinetop Properties Group, 151 Ariz. 9, 725 P.2d 501. (3) Additionally, the mortgage must be “given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price”. This is commonly known as a “purchase money mortgage”. Therefore, the statute does not protect borrowers who have obtained “non-purchase money mortgages” such as home equity lines of credit.
Additionally, the mortgage must be “given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price”. This is commonly known as a “purchase money mortgage”. Therefore, the statute does not protect borrowers who have obtained “non-purchase money mortgages” such as home equity lines of credit.
Refinanced Original Loan.
In Bank One, Arizona, NA. v. Beauvais, the Arizona Court of Appeals dealt with the extending, renewal or refinance of purchase money loans and held that:
“Given these strong statements concerning the legislature’s consumer protection objective, we believe the legislature did not intend that a loan would lose its character as a purchase-money obligation when, as here, it is extended, renewed, or the remaining portion of the original loan is refinanced and the deed of trust on the property that was bought with the original loan continues or is renewed.”
If the property meets Arizona’s anti-deficiency statute, the lender may not obtain a deficiency judgment against the debtor. If a qualifying property is sold by the lender “no action may be maintained to recover any difference between the amount obtained by sale and the amount of the indebtedness and any interest, costs and expenses”. A.R.S. §§ 33-814(G). Therefore, certain Arizonian’s are able to walk away from their homes and face no financial recourse from their lender.